Evaluasi Usability LMS ELENA Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale dan Heuristic Evaluation di STT Nurul Fikri

Erlangga Rahimi(1*),Hana Fauziah(2),Laisa Nurin Mentari(3)
(1) 
(2) STT Terpadu Nurul Fikri
(3) STT Terpadu Nurul Fikri
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.35889/jutisi.v15i3.3776

Abstract

As the primary platform for online learning at STT Terpadu Nurul Fikri, the ELENA LMS requires periodic evaluation to ensure that its interface quality and user interaction patterns remain optimal. Such evaluation is crucial for enabling students to participate actively in virtual classes. This study examines the relationships between system usability, user interaction quality, and student academic engagement. A quantitative approach employing descriptive and explanatory methods was used, involving 120 active students as respondents. Data were collected using the System usability scale (SUS) and Heuristic evaluation—alongside instrument validity and reliability testing—and subsequently analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman Rank correlation. The results show mean scores of 34.37 for usability, 34.06 for user interaction, and 34.89 for student engagement. The instruments proved valid, with Cronbach’s Alpha values of 0.616, 0.862, and 0.871, respectively. Correlation analysis revealed significant positive relationships between the variables, with the strongest link observed between user interaction and student engagement (r = 0.743; p < 0.001). These findings confirm that the ELENA LMS effectively supports the online learning process, although improvements to navigation, system feedback, and interface controls are still needed to enhance the user experience.

Keywords: Heuristic evaluation; Learning management system; Usability; User interaction; System usability scale

Abstrak

Sebagai sarana utama pembelajaran daring di STT Terpadu Nurul Fikri, LMS ELENA perlu dievaluasi secara berkala untuk memastikan kualitas antarmuka dan pola interaksi penggunanya tetap optimal. Evaluasi ini penting agar mahasiswa dapat berpartisipasi aktif dalam kelas virtual. Penelitian ini menelaah keterkaitan antara aspek kegunaan sistem, kualitas interaksi pengguna, serta tingkat keterlibatan akademik mahasiswa. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode deskriptif dan eksplanatori digunakan, melibatkan 120 mahasiswa aktif sebagai responden. Data dikumpulkan melalui System usability scale (SUS), Heuristic evaluation, serta uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen, kemudian dianalisis dengan statistik deskriptif dan korelasi Spearman Rank. Hasil menunjukkan rata-rata skor usability 34,37, user interaction 34,06, dan student engagement 34,89. Instrumen terbukti valid dengan nilai Cronbach’s Alpha masing-masing 0,616, 0,862, dan 0,871. Analisis korelasi memperlihatkan hubungan positif signifikan antarvariabel, dengan keterkaitan paling kuat antara interaksi pengguna dan keterlibatan mahasiswa (r = 0,743; p < 0,001). Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa LMS ELENA telah mendukung proses pembelajaran daring secara efektif, meskipun perbaikan pada navigasi, umpan balik sistem, dan kontrol antarmuka masih diperlukan untuk meningkatkan pengalaman pengguna.

 

Keywords


Heuristic evaluation; Learning management system; Usability; User interaction; System usability scale

References


G. Leonarde Ginting and N. Silalahi, “Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna Terhadap e-Learning Moodle Berbasis Web Dengan Menerapkan Metode SUS,” J. Informatics Manag. Inf. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 2025, doi: 10.47065/jimat.v5i1.469.

R. Missouri and Z. A. Aldillah, “Analisis Implementasi LMS dalam Manajemen Tugas terhadap,” vol. 5, pp. 826–840, 2025.

M. Asqia, Y. Zulkarnain, and A. Fadhlila, “Evaluasi Sistem ELena Berdasarkan Aspek Pengguna Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Dengan Menggunakan Metode Technology Readiness Index,” Teknika, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 148–156, 2022, doi: 10.34148/teknika.v11i2.484.

R. D. Dewi, S. H. Wijoyo, and R. I. Rokhmawati, “Evaluasi dan Rekomendasi Perbaikan Website Virtual Learning Management Universitas Brawijaya pada Perangkat Bergerak Menggunakan Metode Heuristic Evaluation dan System Usability Scale (SUS),” Jptiik, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1199–1206, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id

M. M. P. Pane, R. Rahmawati, and D. Wijayanto, “Evaluasi Usability E-Learning Universitas Tanjungpura Dengan Pendekatan Human Computer Interaction Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale Dan Heuristic Evaluation,” Integr. Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 15–23, 2023.

S. Setiyanto and I. F. Yasin, “Analisis User Interface pada Website E-Learning dengan Metode Evaluasi Heuristik,” Indones. J. Multidiscip. Soc. Technol., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 327–332, 2023, doi: 10.31004/ijmst.v1i3.293.

G. Waladow, S. D. E. Paturusi, and A. S. M. Lumenta, “E-Learning Portal Design: Usability Determination via Heuristic Evaluation from User Experience Analysis,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 19, no. 02, pp. 149–159, 2024.

V. Alfilaeni, D. Krisbiantoro, and G. Setyaningsih, “Evaluasi Usability Aplikasi Tiket.com Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale (SUS),” CSRID (Computer Sci. Res. Its Dev. Journal), vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 27–39, 2024, doi: 10.22303/csrid-.16.3.2024.27-39.

I Putu Eka Sudarsana, “Antara Fitur dan Pengalaman: Evaluasi Usability Aplikasi E-Learning Berbasis Web,” J. Penelit. Terap. Mhs., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 11–20, 2025, doi: 10.63604/jptm.v3i2.183.

A. Sani, A. Andrianingsih, and A. Pratama, “Analisis Interaksi Mahasiswa Terhadap Jurnal Kampus Berbasis Model Usability,” Progresif J. Ilm. Komput., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 189, 2024, doi: 10.35889/progresif.v20i1.1803.

L. Naing, R. Bin Nordin, H. Abdul Rahman, and Y. T. Naing, “Sample size calculation for prevalence studies using Scalex and ScalaR calculators,” BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 22, no. 1, p. 209, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01694-7.

W. Sulistyawati, W. Wahyudi, and S. Trinuryono, “Analisis Motivasi Belajar Siswa Dengan Blended Learning di Masa Pandemi Covid 19,” KadikmA, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 68, 2022.

S. Sudrajat, “Analisis Kualitas Instrumen Tes Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa Smp,” ELIPS J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 210–221, 2024, doi: 10.47650/elips.v5i2.1398.

E. Azhari, L. M. Saleh, and M. Marantika, “Journal agregate vol. 2, no. 2, september 2023,” Anal. Fakt. Penyebab Keterlambatan Proy. Pembang. Gedung Lab. Terpadu Dan Perpust. Man 1 Maluku Teng., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 230–239, 2023.

Y. Ofosu-Asare, “Enhancing user experience in online learning environments: Design, evaluation, and usability techniques,” J. Graph. Eng. Des., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 45–59, 2024, doi: 10.24867/JGED-2024-4-045.

J. S. Alqurni, “Evaluating the User Interface and Usability Approaches for E-Learning Systems,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Web Eng., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2023, doi: 10.4018/IJITWE.333638.

S. R. Saputro, H. B. Santoso, and A. Info, “Usability Evaluation and Alternative Interface Design Recommendations for the GoFood Merchant Application,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 134–145, 2026, doi: 10.59395/ijadis.v7i1.1496.


The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off

Full Text: File PDF

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.