Penggunaan COBIT 2019 I&T Risk Management untuk Pengelolaan Risiko Transformasi Digital BankCo
Abstract
Advances in information technology (IT) in the banking industry such as BankCo to implement digital transformation (TD). However, failures often occur in the implementation of TD due to poor IT governance. Therefore TD activities are regulated in PER-2/MBU/03/2023 concerning guidelines for corporate governance and the Indonesian Financial Services Sector Master Plan 2021-2025 concerning accelerating digital transformation. This research applies the DSR using the semi-structured interview method and design factor analysis using the COBIT 2019 Information and Technology Risk framework. The results of the design factor analysis resulted in prioritized IT management governance objectives (TKMTI) in the form of EDM03 Ensured Risk Optimization, APO12 Managed Risk, and APO02 Managed Strategy. Furthermore, an analysis of focus areas, preparation of recommendations, design of solutions, and roadmaps according to the seven components of governance were carried out, thus increasing the capability value by 0.6 (16.67%) from before the improvement. This research contributes to the knowledge base for related research, as well as being a reference for managing IT risk management for BankCo, as well as the banking industry in general.
Keywords: Digital Transformation; IT Governance and Management; COBIT I&T Risk Management Focus Area; Design Science Research; Bank.
Abstrak
Kemajuan teknologi informasi (TI) dalam industri perbankan seperti BankCo untuk melakukan implementasi transformasi digital (TD). Namun sering terjadi kegagalan dalam implementasi TD dikarenakan tata kelola TI yang kurang baik. Oleh karena itu kegiatan TD diatur dalam PER-2/MBU/03/2023 tentang pedoman tata kelola korporasi dan Master Plan Sektor Jasa Keuangan Indonesia 2021-2025 mengenai percepatan transformasi digital. Penelitian ini menerapkan DSR dengan metode wawancara semi terstruktur dan analisis faktor desain menggunakan kerangka kerja COBIT 2019 Information and Technology Risk. Hasil analisis faktor desain, menghasilkan prioritas tujuan tata kelola manajemen TI (TKMTI) berupa EDM03 Ensured Risk Optimization, APO12 Managed Risk, dan APO02 Managed Strategy. Selanjutnya dilakukan analisis fokus area, penyusunan rekomendasi, perancangan solusi, dan roadmap sesuai tujuh komponen tata kelola, hingga meningkatkan nilai kapabilitas sebesar 0,6 (16,67%) dari sebelum perbaikan. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada basis pengetahuan untuk penelitian terkait, serta menjadi referensi pengelolaan manajemen risiko TI bagi BankCo, serta industri perbankan pada umumnya.
Keywords
References
R. S. Naibaho, "Peranan Dan Perencanaan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Perusahaan," Jurnal Warta, vol. 52 pp. 1-12, 2017.
L. Santioso, "Analisis Persepsi Kegunaan, Persepsi Kemudahan, Kesiapan Teknologi Informasi, Keamanan dan Kerahasiaan Terhadap Minat Perilaku Penggunaan E-Filling," Jurnal Akuntansi, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 247-268, 2018.
K. S. R. Warner and M. Wäger, “Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal,” Long Range Plann, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 326–349, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001.
J. Bloomberg, “Digitilization, Digitalization, And, Digital Transformation: Confuse Them At Your Peril,” 2018, pp. 2-6.
Y. Gong, J. Yang, and X. Shi, “Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1-13, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101487.
R. Mulyana, L. Rusu, and E. Perjons, “IT Governance Mechanisms that Influence Digital Transformation: A Delphi Study in Indonesian Banking and Insurance Industry,” Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1-16, Jun. 2022.
R. Mulyana, L. Rusu, and E. Perjons, “How Hybrid IT Governance Mechanisms Influence Digital Transformation and Organizational Performance in the Banking and Insurance Industry of Indonesia,” Information System Development (ISD) Conference, Lisbon: Association for Information System (AIS), 2023.
J. Jewer and N. Van Der Meulen, Governance of Digital Transformation: A Review of the Literature. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/10125/80144
BankCo, “Annual Report BankCo 2020,” 2020.
R. Mulyana, L. Rusu, and E. Perjons, “Association for Information Systems Association for Information Systems IT Governance Mechanisms Infuence on Digital Transformation: IT Governance Mechanisms Infuence on Digital Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review A Systematic Literature Review.” [Online]. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2021
B. Indonesia, "PERATURAN BANK INDONESIA NOMOR 19/12/PBI/2017," 2017.
M. BUMN, "Peraturan Menteri Badan Usaha Milik Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor PER-2/MBU/03/2023," 2023.
“OJK 2021 The Indonesian Financial Service Master Plan 2021-2025”.
I. Maghfiroh, M. Murahartawaty, and R. Mulyana, “Analisis Dan Perancangan Tata Kelola Ti Menggunakan Cobit 4.1 Domain Deliver And Support (DS) PT XYZ,” Jurnal Sistem Informasi, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 49, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.21609/jsi.v12i1.467.
S. De Haes, L. Caluwe, T. Huygh, and A. Joshi, “Management for Professionals Governing Digital Transformation.” [Online]. Available: http://www.springer.com/series/10101
ISACA, COBIT Focus Area: Information & Technology Risk Using COBIT 2019, ISACA, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.isaca.org
P. M. Dewi, R. Fauzi, and R. Mulyana, “Perancangan Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Untuk Transformasi Digital di Industri Perbankan Menggunakan Framework COBIT 2019 Domain Build, Acquire, and Implement: Studi Kasusu Bank XYZ.” e-Proceeding of Engineering, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 9672-9683, 2021.
G. Bongiorno, D. Rizzo, and G. Vaia, “CIOs and the digital transformation: A new leadership role. Springer International, pp. 1-232, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31026-8.
G. Vial, “Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 28, no. 2. Elsevier B.V., pp. 118–144, Jun. 01, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.
E. Gökalp and V. Martinez, “Digital transformation maturity assessment: development of the digital transformation capability maturity model,” Int J Prod Res, vol. 60, no. 20, pp. 6282–6302, 2022, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1991020.
T. Z. Nurafifah, R. Mulyana, and L. Abdurrahman, “Pengujian Model Pengaruh Tata Kelola TI Terhadap Transformasi Digital dan Kinerja Bank A,” Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 73–82, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.47065/josh.v4i1.2257.
N. Afifah, R. Mulyana, and L. Abdurrahman, “Survei Pengaruh Tata Kelola TI terhadap Transformasi Digital dan Kinerja Organisasi Bank,” Sistemasi, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1-13, Sept. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://sistemasi.ftik.unisi.ac.id
F. Luthfia, R. Mulyana, and L. Ramadani, “Analisis Pengaruh Tata Kelola TI Terhadap Transformasi Digital dan Kinerja Bank B,” ZONAsi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 37-50, Sept. 2022.
A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram, “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 75-105, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25148625
M. Denscombe, “The Good Research Guide,” Mc Graw-Hill, vol. 4, pp. 1-389, 2010.
A. K. Shenton, “Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects,” Education for Information, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 63–75, 2004, doi: 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.
SFIA 8, Summary Chart Strategy and architecture Change and transformation Relationships and engagement People and skills Levels of responsibility Development and implementation, SFIA 8 2021. [Online]. Available: www.sfia-online.org
How To Cite This :
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
