Analisis Quality of Service Pada Infrastruktur Jaringan Kantor Wilayah BPN Provinsi Papua
Abstract
This study analyzes the quality of network service (Quality of Service/QoS) at the Papua Province National Land Agency (BPN) Regional Office by comparing two main network platforms, namely Mikrotik and Ruijie Cloud. Measurements are carried out with the main QoS parameters, namely throughput, packet loss, delay, and jitter, using Wireshark software referring to the TIPHON standard. Evaluation in three network usage scenarios, namely use during service, special service, and normal activities, to get an overview of network performance. The results of the study on the throughput parameter, Ruijie Cloud averaged 2,642 Mbps under normal conditions, higher than Mikrotik which only reached 2,149 Mbps. Packet loss parameters, Ruijie Cloud got lower packet loss (9.87%) compared to Mikrotik (16.13%) under normal conditions, indicating a better level of network stability. Delay parameters, Ruijie Cloud showed lower delays in general service conditions (4.03 ms) compared to Mikrotik (5,563 ms). In addition, the jitter on Ruijie Cloud is more stable, more suitable for use in low latency and high network stability applications.
Keyword: Quality of Service; Wireshark; TIPHON; Mikrotik; Ruijie Cloud
Abstrak
Penelitian ini menganalisis kualitas layanan jaringan (Quality of Service/QoS) pada Kantor Wilayah Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) Provinsi Papua dengan membandingkan dua platform jaringan utama, yaitu Mikrotik dan Ruijie Cloud. Pengukuran dilakukan dengan parameter utama QoS, yaitu throughput, packet loss, delay, dan jitter, menggunakan perangkat lunak Wireshark mengacu pada standar TIPHON. Evaluasi dalam tiga skenario penggunaan jaringan, yaitu penggunaan saat pelayanan, pelayanan khusus, dan kegiatan biasa, guna mendapatkan gambaran performa jaringan. Hasil penelitian pada parameter throughput, Ruijie Cloud rata-rata 2.642 Mbps dalam kondisi normal, lebih tinggi dibandingkan Mikrotik hanya mencapai 2.149 Mbps. Parameter packet loss, Ruijie Cloud mendapatkan packet loss yang lebih rendah (9.87%) dibandingkan Mikrotik (16.13%) dalam kondisi normal, menunjukkan tingkat kestabilan jaringan lebih baik. Parameter delay, Ruijie Cloud menunjukkan delay lebih rendah dalam kondisi layanan umum (4.03 ms) dibandingkan Mikrotik (5.563 ms). Selain itu, jitter Ruijie Cloud lebih stabil, cocok digunakan dalam aplikasi latensi rendah dan stabilitas jaringan tinggi.
Keywords
References
I. Nurrobi, K. Kusnadi, and R. Adam, “Penerapan Metode Qos (Quality Of Service) Untuk Menganalisa Kualitas Kinerja Jaringan Wireless,” J. Digit, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 47–58, May 2020, doi: 10.51920/jd.v10i1.155.
S. Sirmayanti, A. Tain, and N. K. Hamzidah, “Comparative Study of QoS on Video Meeting Tool Application in 4G LTE Network using Wireshark,” SISTEMASI, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 31–40, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.32520/stmsi.v12i1.2069.
P. Sijabat and A. Simangunsong, “Optimizing Network Performance in Cloud Computing Environments Through Dynamic Resource Allocation Strategies,” DIKE J. Ilmu Multidisiplin, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 58–61, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.69688/dike.v2i2.104.
N. Muhammad Wildan Putra Pratama, F. Fatchurrohman, and I. Budi Susanto, “Optimalisasi Jaringan Internet Dengan Menggunakaan Simple Queue Dan Firewall Mikrotik Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri Kota Malang,” JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 12828–12835, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.36040/jati.v8i6.12130.
M. Y. B. Rasyiidin, F. A. Murad, and F. A. Murad, “Monitoring Server Berbasis SNMP Menggunakan Cacti pada Server Lokal,” J. Ilm. FIFO, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 14–23, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.22441/fifo.2021.v13i1.002.
A. Pradana, I. R. Widiasari, and R. Efendi, “Implementasi Sistem Monitoring Jaringan Menggunakan Zabbix Berbasis SNMP,” AITI, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 248–262, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.24246/aiti.v19i2.248-262.
N. Nendi and F. Maulana, “Monitoring Traffic Berbasis SNMP pada Jaringan Perumahan Permata Puri Harmoni 2,” J. Sains dan Teknol., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 735–740, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.55338/saintek.v5i3.1346.
I. Irvan and P. Rosyani, “Implementasi Sistem Monitoring Jaringan Kantor PT Mitra Solusi Infokom Menggunakan Manageengine Opmanager dengan Metode SNMP Protocol,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–46, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.47065/josh.v3i1.1101.
P. Kukuh Prayogi, M. Orisa, and F. Ariwibisono, “Rancang Bangun Sistem Monitoring Jaringan Access Point Menggunakan Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Berbasis Web,” JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 192–197, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.36040/jati.v4i1.2327.
Sugiyono, Metode penelitian bisnis: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2014.
D. Wijayanto, “Penerapan Metode Deskriptif dalam Evaluasi Kebijakan Jaminan Sosial,” J. Eval. Kebijak., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 88–104, 2021.
M. C. Shofwan and Y. Shalahuddin, “Study of QoS Comparison of UTP and Fiber Optic Cable Using the Wireshark Application,” JTECS J. Sist. Telekomun. Elektron. Sist. Kontrol Power Sist. dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.32503/jtecs.v3i1.3335.
M. Hasbi and N. R. Saputra, “Analisis Quality of Service ( Qos ) Jaringan Internet Kantor Pusat King Bukopin Dengan Menggunakan Wireshark,” Univ. Muhammadiyah Jakarta, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021, doi: 10.24853/justit.12.1.%25p.
M. Y. Simargolang and A. Widarma, “Quality of Service (QoS) for Network Performance Analysis Wireless Area Network (WLAN),” CESS (Journal Comput. Eng. Syst. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 162–171, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.24114/cess.v7i1.29758.
K. Masykuroh, A. D. Ramadhani, and N. Iryani, “Analisis Qos Dan Qoe Pada Video Pembelajaran Online Di Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto (ITTP),” Transmisi, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 40–47, May 2021, doi: 10.14710/transmisi.23.2.40-47.
I. A. Pujakesuma, I. Iskandar, Novriyanto, and Pizaini, “Analisis Kualitas Jaringan Internet 4G Menggunakan Metode Quality of,” Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 798–805, 2023, doi: 10.30865/klik.v3i6.897.
A. M. N. Ramadan, “Analisis Kualitas Layanan Live Streaming Menggunakan Standar Tiphon Pada Website Vidio.Com, Visionplus.Id, Dan Transtv.Co.Id,” J. Ilm. Teknol. dan Rekayasa, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 170–181, 2024, doi: 10.35760/tr.2024.v29i2.8985.
How To Cite This :
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
